Subscribe, build a custom feed, or pitch a sponsorship at hello@acadenix.com
Latest intel// live feed
CVE-2026-39833 — Golang Crypto: The in-memory keyring returned by NewKeyring() silently accepted keys with the ConfirmBeforeUse constraint but
The in-memory keyring returned by NewKeyring() silently accepted keys with the ConfirmBeforeUse constraint but never enforced it. The key would sign without any confirmation prompt, with no indication to the caller that the constraint was not in effect. NewKeyring() now returns an error when unsupported constraints are requested. CVSSv3.1 9.1 (CRITICAL)
CVE-2026-39832 — Golang Crypto: When adding a key to a remote agent constraint extensions such as restrict-destination-v00@openssh.com were
When adding a key to a remote agent constraint extensions such as restrict-destination-v00@openssh.com were not serialized in the request. Destination restrictions were silently stripped when forwarding keys, allowing unrestricted use of the key on the remote host. The client now serializes all constraint extensions. Additionally, the in-memory keyring returned by NewKeyring() now rejects keys with unsupported constraint extensions instead of silently ignoring them. CVSSv3.1 9.1 (CRITICAL)
CVE-2026-39831 — Golang Crypto: The Verify() method for FIDO/U2F security key types (sk-ecdsa-sha2-nistp256@openssh.com, sk-ssh-ed25519@openssh.com) did not check the
The Verify() method for FIDO/U2F security key types (sk-ecdsa-sha2-nistp256@openssh.com, sk-ssh-ed25519@openssh.com) did not check the User Presence flag. Signatures generated without physical touch were accepted, allowing unattended use of a hardware security key. To restore the previous behavior, return a "no-touch-required" extension in Permissions.Extensions from PublicKeyCallback. CVSSv3.1 9.1 (CRITICAL)
CVE-2026-39830 — Golang Crypto: The blocked goroutine could not be released by calling Close(), resulting in a resource
A malicious SSH peer could send unsolicited global request responses to fill an internal buffer, blocking the connection's read loop. The blocked goroutine could not be released by calling Close(), resulting in a resource leak per connection. Unsolicited global responses are now discarded. CVSSv3.1 9.1 (CRITICAL)
CVE-2026-34910 — A malicious actor with access to the network could exploit an Improper Input Validation
A malicious actor with access to the network could exploit an Improper Input Validation vulnerability found in UniFi OS devices to execute a Command Injection. CVSSv3.1 10.0 (CRITICAL)
CVE-2026-34909 — A malicious actor with access to the network could exploit a Path Traversal vulnerability
A malicious actor with access to the network could exploit a Path Traversal vulnerability found in UniFi OS devices to access files on the underlying system that could be manipulated to access an underlying account. CVSSv3.1 10.0 (CRITICAL)
CVE-2026-34908 — A malicious actor with access to the network could exploit an Improper Access Control
A malicious actor with access to the network could exploit an Improper Access Control vulnerability found in UniFi OS devices to make unauthorized changes to the system. CVSSv3.1 10.0 (CRITICAL)
CVE-2026-33000 — A malicious actor with access to the network and high privileges could exploit an
A malicious actor with access to the network and high privileges could exploit an Improper Input Validation vulnerability found in UniFi OS devices to execute a Command Injection. CVSSv3.1 9.1 (CRITICAL)
Analyzing Void Dokkaebi’s Cython-Compiled InvisibleFerret Malware
Trend Micro Research analyzed Void Dokkaebi's updated InvisibleFerret malware, which now uses Cython compilation to convert Python scripts into native binaries (.pyd on Windows, .so on macOS) for evasion. The malware targets software developers with access to cryptocurrency wallets, CI/CD pipelines, and signing keys, with expanded capabilities including backdoor access, browser credential theft, clipboard monitoring, keylogging, and trojanized wallet extension installation. BeaverTail, the delivery mechanism, has evolved into multiple variants with overlapping functionality and sophisticated multi-layer obfuscation techniques.
PHANTOMPULSE: anatomy of a hijackable blockchain-C2 RAT
Elastic Security Labs reverse-engineered PHANTOMPULSE, a Windows RAT deployed by the REF6598 intrusion set targeting crypto-sector victims. The implant uses blockchain (Ethereum/Base/Optimism) transaction inputs for decentralized C2 resolution, implements three process-injection techniques (module stomping, debug-API state machine, manual PE mapping), and bypasses AMSI/WLDP/ETW via a shared hardware-breakpoint primitive. The analysis reveals the blockchain C2 channel lacks sender verification, allowing defenders to sinkhole all instances with a single transaction.
CVE-2026-8434 — Concretecms Concrete_cms: Concrete CMS 9 before 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) at
Concrete CMS 9 before 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) at concrete/controllers/backend/file rescanMultiple(). The Concrete CMS security team gave this vulnerability a CVSS v.4.0 score of 2.3 with vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N. Thanks Yonatan Drori (Tenzai) for reporting. CVSSv3.1 8.8 (HIGH)
CVE-2026-8433 — Concretecms Concrete_cms: Concrete CMS 9 before 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) at
Concrete CMS 9 before 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) at concrete/controllers/backend/file rescan(). The Concrete CMS security team gave this vulnerability a CVSS v.4.0 score of 2.3 with vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N. Thanks Yonatan Drori (Tenzai) for reporting. CVSSv3.1 8.8 (HIGH)
CVE-2026-8432 — Concretecms Concrete_cms: Concrete CMS 9 before 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) at
Concrete CMS 9 before 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) at concrete/controllers/backend/file star(). The Concrete CMS security team gave this vulnerability a CVSS v.4.0 score of 2.3 with vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N. Thanks Yonatan Drori (Tenzai) for reporting. CVSSv3.1 8.8 (HIGH)
CVE-2026-8427 — Concretecms Concrete_cms: Concrete CMS 9 before 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) at
Concrete CMS 9 before 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) at concrete/controllers/backend/file removeFavoriteFolder($id). The Concrete CMS security team gave this vulnerability a CVSS v.4.0 score of 2.3 with vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N. Thanks Yonatan Drori (Tenzai) for reporting. CVSSv3.1 8.8 (HIGH)
CVE-2026-8416 — Concretecms Concrete_cms: Concrete CMS 9 before 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) at
Concrete CMS 9 before 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) at concrete/controllers/backend/file addFavoriteFolder($id). The Concrete CMS security team gave this vulnerability a CVSS v.4.0 score of 2.3 with vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N. Thanks Yonatan Drori (Tenzai) for reporting. CVSSv3.1 8.8 (HIGH)
CVE-2026-8415 — Concretecms Concrete_cms: Concrete CMS 9 before 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) at
Concrete CMS 9 before 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) at concrete/controllers/dialog/express/association/reorder. The Concrete CMS security team gave this vulnerability a CVSS v.4.0 score of 2.3 with vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N. Thanks Yonatan Drori (Tenzai) for reporting. CVSSv3.1 8.8 (HIGH)
CVE-2026-8414 — Concretecms Concrete_cms: Concrete CMS 9 before 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) at
Concrete CMS 9 before 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) at concrete/controllers/dialog/event/duplicate. The Concrete CMS security team gave this vulnerability a CVSS v.4.0 score of 2.3 with vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N. Thanks Yonatan Drori (Tenzai) for reporting. CVSSv3.1 8.8 (HIGH)
CVE-2026-8413 — Concretecms Concrete_cms: Concrete CMS 9 before 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) at
Concrete CMS 9 before 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) at concrete/controllers/dialog/page/bulk/design. The Concrete CMS security team gave this vulnerability a CVSS v.4.0 score of 2.3 with vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N. Thanks Yonatan Drori (Tenzai) for reporting. CVSSv3.1 8.8 (HIGH)
CVE-2026-8412 — Concretecms Concrete_cms: Concrete CMS 9 before 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) at
Concrete CMS 9 before 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) at concrete/controllers/dialog/page/bulk/cache. The Concrete CMS security team gave this vulnerability a CVSS v.4.0 score of 2.3 with vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N. Thanks Yonatan Drori (Tenzai) for reporting. CVSSv3.1 8.8 (HIGH)
CVE-2026-8411 — Concretecms Concrete_cms: Concrete CMS 9 before 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) at
Concrete CMS 9 before 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) at concrete/controllers/dialog/page/bulk/delete. The Concrete CMS security team gave this vulnerability a CVSS v.4.0 score of 2.3 with vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N. Thanks Yonatan Drori (Tenzai) for reporting. CVSSv3.1 8.8 (HIGH)
CVE-2026-8410 — Concretecms Concrete_cms: Concrete CMS 9 before 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) at
Concrete CMS 9 before 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) at concrete/controllers/dialog/logs/bulk/delete. The The Concrete CMS security team gave this vulnerability a CVSS v.4.0 score of 2.3 with vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N. Thanks Yonatan Drori (Tenzai) for reporting. CVSSv3.1 8.8 (HIGH)
CVE-2026-8409 — Concretecms Concrete_cms: Concrete CMS 9 before 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) at
Concrete CMS 9 before 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) at concrete/controllers/dialog/logs/delete. The The Concrete CMS security team gave this vulnerability a CVSS v.4.0 score of 2.3 with vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N. Thanks Yonatan Drori (Tenzai) for reporting. CVSSv3.1 8.8 (HIGH)
CVE-2026-6960 — BookingPress: The BookingPress Pro plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file uploads due to
The BookingPress Pro plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file uploads due to missing file type validation in the 'bookingpress_validate_submitted_booking_form_func' function in all versions up to, and including, 5.6. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to upload arbitrary files on the affected site's server which may make remote code execution possible. Note: The vulnerability can only be exploited if a signature custom field is added to the booki CVSSv3.1 9.8 (CRITICAL)
CVE-2026-8428 — Concretecms Concrete_cms: Concrete CMS 9.5.0 and below emits a CSRF token in the local_available_update.php view ($token->output('do_update'))
Concrete CMS 9.5.0 and below emits a CSRF token in the local_available_update.php view ($token->output('do_update')) but the corresponding do_update() method in concrete/controllers/single_page/dashboard/system/update/update.php never calls $this->token->validate('do_update'). The form is rendered as a POST form, meaning the token reaches the browser, but because the controller discards it without verification, an attacker can craft a cross-site POST that triggers a core CMS CVSSv3.1 8.8 (HIGH)
CVE-2026-8426 — Concretecms Concrete_cms: Concrete CMS 9.5.0 and below does not validate a CSRF token before processing requests
Concrete CMS 9.5.0 and below does not validate a CSRF token before processing requests to /dashboard/extend/update/prepare_remote_upgrade/<remoteMPID>. An attacker who controls the remote package returned for a known marketplace item ID can overwrite the package PHP on disk and force its upgrade() method to execute in a single browser navigation. This results in remote code execution as the web server user. In order to be vulnerable, the victim must be passing canInstallPac CVSSv3.1 8.8 (HIGH)